CVE-2022-2576 (GCVE-0-2022-2576)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-07-29 13:20 – Updated: 2024-08-03 00:39
VLAI
Summary
In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • CWE-408 - Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Amplification
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018 x_refsource_CONFIRM
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
The Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Californium Affected: 2.0.0 , < unspecified (custom)
Affected: unspecified , ≤ 2.7.2 (custom)
Affected: 3.0.0 , < unspecified (custom)
Affected: unspecified , ≤ 3.5.0 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:39:08.153Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Eclipse Californium",
          "vendor": "The Eclipse Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "unspecified",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "unspecified",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.5.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-408",
              "description": "CWE-408: Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Amplification",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-07-29T13:20:10.000Z",
        "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
        "shortName": "eclipse"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-2576",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Eclipse Californium",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003e=",
                            "version_value": "2.0.0"
                          },
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                            "version_value": "2.7.2"
                          },
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003e=",
                            "version_value": "3.0.0"
                          },
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                            "version_value": "3.5.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-408: Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Amplification"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
    "assignerShortName": "eclipse",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-2576",
    "datePublished": "2022-07-29T13:20:10.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-07-29T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:39:08.153Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2022-2576",
      "date": "2026-10-03",
      "epss": "0.00588",
      "percentile": "0.46229"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.